An excellent article on Equidaily suggests that very thing. You can read all about it here.
I dont think this will actually change any opinions and it may not even change mine but it does bring to light the fact that Invasor's campaign was simply not as good as Lava Man's. This is a supposition supported by the TCR rankings which still have Lava Man in first overall with Invasor in second.
Numbers dont lie and there is little question that Lava Man had a more accomplished season. The question is whether or not accomplishments are the deciding factor for the Horse of the Year award.
Tuesday, December 05, 2006
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment